Palmer City Manager Stephen Jellie faces potential censure and removal after just 45 days. The controversy began when Jellie placed Police Chief Dwayne Shelton on paid administrative leave, sparking heated debate. Shelton claims this is a retaliatory action due to his public safety concerns and employee rights advocacy.
At a recent meeting, city council members and officials accused Jellie of dismantling the city and violating employee rights. Officer Matt Moore urged the council to act quickly, stating that Jellie’s actions would lead to “dire need and vulnerability” for the city. Jellie asserts that he’s being wrongly blamed, emphasizing that his predecessors approved the dispatch center relocation plan before his tenure began.
This isn’t Jellie’s first controversy. He resigned from similar positions in Wyoming and New York, receiving substantial severance packages. The International Association of Fire Fighters censured Jellie last month, citing disregard for the law and disrespect for firefighters during his time in New York.
Jellie’s contract, dated July 22, 2024, outlines termination details. If terminated for convenience, he’ll receive full benefits, six months of health benefits, and a lump sum equal to six months’ salary. However, termination for cause, including misconduct or neglect, would entitle him to nothing.
Jellie acknowledges serving at the pleasure of the city council. “If Councilman Josh Tudor doesn’t feel I’m serving him or the city, it’s within his right to call for my resignation,” he stated.
The Palmer City Controversy has sparked intense debate among residents. Palmer City Council members and residents vigorously condemn Jellie’s actions, calling for his ouster. As the Palmer City Controversy unfolds, the city council will address Jellie’s administrative leave and potential removal.
The Palmer City Controversy raises questions about Jellie’s leadership and the city’s future. With the emergency council meeting concluded, the city awaits the council’s decision on Jellie’s fate.
Palmer City residents are actively questioning what lies ahead for their community amidst the ongoing controversy.
This news story was originally published by Alaska’s News Source.
