Google has proposed new limits to its revenue-sharing agreements with companies like Apple. This move aims to address antitrust concerns over its online search business. Google antitrust remedies are a crucial step in this process.
In August, US District Judge Amit Mehta ruled that Google had illegally crushed its competition in search. Consequently, the company has vowed to appeal the decision. Google’s proposed remedies include allowing partners to change their default search provider at least every 12 months.
Furthermore, the company has suggested widening its options. This includes allowing different default search engines to be assigned to multiple platforms and browsing modes. The US Department of Justice (DOJ) recommended that Judge Mehta force Google to stop entering revenue-sharing contracts.
Additionally, the DOJ suggested that Google sell Chrome, the world’s most popular web browser. However, Google’s search engine accounts for about 90% of all online searches globally. In a statement, Google called the DOJ’s remedies overboard.
Meanwhile, Judge Mehta is expected to issue a decision in the remedies phase of the landmark case by August, after a trial. The outcome of this case will have significant implications for the tech industry.
Google’s proposed antitrust remedies aim to address concerns over its online search business. The company’s antitrust remedies are a step towards finding a solution to the ongoing battle with the DOJ. The company’s willingness to change its business practices is a positive development. However, the outcome of the case is still uncertain. The decision will impact the future of online search and the tech industry.
